Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer

Adapting to the NAR Commission Changes

10 min
5/6

Key Takeaways

  • The 2024 NAR settlement eliminated MLS-based commission offers and required written buyer representation agreements.
  • Sellers can still offer buyer agent compensation but must do so outside the MLS listing.
  • Investors buying properties should budget for direct buyer agent compensation and negotiate representation agreements.
  • Sophisticated investors can reduce transaction costs by 1-2% per deal by understanding and negotiating the new commission structure.

The 2024 NAR commission restructuring—resulting from the Sitzer-Burnett settlement—fundamentally changed how buyer agent compensation is structured in residential real estate transactions. This case study examines how the changes affect investors who buy and sell properties, and the practical adaptations required.

1

What Changed in the Commission Structure

The NAR settlement, effective August 2024, produced three key changes: (1) Offers of buyer agent compensation can no longer be made through MLS listings. Sellers are no longer required to offer compensation to buyer agents as a condition of listing on the MLS. (2) Buyer representation agreements are required before agents can show properties. Buyers must sign a written agreement specifying the compensation their agent will receive before viewing properties. (3) Compensation is negotiable. Buyer agent compensation is no longer standardized—it is individually negotiated between the buyer and their agent, and potentially between the buyer's agent and the seller's agent. The practical effect is that the traditional model—where sellers paid 5-6% commission split between listing and buyer agents—is being replaced by a more fragmented structure where each side negotiates separately.

2

Impact on Real Estate Investors

For investors selling properties: commission costs may decrease if buyers negotiate lower agent compensation, but marketing effort may increase because buyer agents have less financial incentive to show your property. Sellers can still offer buyer agent compensation as a marketing tool—it is simply no longer done through the MLS. For investors buying properties: you may need to pay your buyer agent directly rather than relying on the seller to cover the compensation. Budget an additional 2-3% of purchase price for buyer representation, though this cost may be partially offset by negotiating lower purchase prices. For investors who purchase directly from sellers (off-market, FSBO, wholesaler): minimal impact—these transactions already operated outside the MLS commission structure. The net effect is greater complexity and negotiability in every transaction, requiring investors to be more knowledgeable about commission structures and more strategic in their use of agents.

3

Practical Adaptation Strategies

Investors should adapt in the following ways. When Selling: evaluate whether offering buyer agent compensation (off-MLS) attracts more showings and better offers—test different approaches on different listings. Consider flat-fee or discount brokerages for straightforward transactions. When Buying: negotiate buyer representation agreements that align compensation with the value the agent provides—consider flat fees for investors who source their own deals and need only transaction management. Build relationships with agents who understand investor transactions and are willing to negotiate flexible compensation structures. For All Transactions: educate yourself on the full transaction cost structure so you can negotiate effectively. The commission changes create an opportunity for sophisticated investors who understand the new landscape to reduce transaction costs by 1-2% per deal—a significant improvement on margins.

Guided Practice: Navigating the Post-NAR Settlement Transaction as an Investor

You are purchasing an 8-unit apartment building listed at $780,000 in a market where the NAR commission changes are fully implemented. You typically work with a buyer's agent for acquisitions.

  1. 1Before viewing properties, negotiate a buyer representation agreement with your agent. For investor transactions, propose a flat fee ($5,000-$10,000) or a reduced percentage (1-1.5%) rather than the traditional 2.5-3% buyer agent commission.
  2. 2Ask the listing agent whether the seller is offering any buyer agent compensation. If the seller offers 2%, negotiate with your agent to credit the difference between the seller's offer and your agreed fee back to you at closing.
  3. 3Factor the net buyer agent cost into your acquisition underwriting. If you are paying $7,500 in buyer agent fees directly, add this to your total acquisition cost when calculating returns.
  4. 4During negotiations, if the seller is not offering buyer agent compensation, evaluate whether requesting it as a seller concession is more effective than requesting a price reduction. In some cases, the seller may prefer to pay the buyer agent to facilitate the transaction.
  5. 5For future acquisitions, evaluate whether you need full buyer representation or only transaction management. Some experienced investors use attorneys or flat-fee transaction coordinators for straightforward purchases at lower cost.
  6. 6Track your total transaction costs under the new structure versus the old model. Many investors find that direct negotiation produces savings of 1-2% per transaction once they become comfortable with the process.

Key Takeaways

  • The 2024 NAR settlement eliminated MLS-based commission offers and required written buyer representation agreements.
  • Sellers can still offer buyer agent compensation but must do so outside the MLS listing.
  • Investors buying properties should budget for direct buyer agent compensation and negotiate representation agreements.
  • Sophisticated investors can reduce transaction costs by 1-2% per deal by understanding and negotiating the new commission structure.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Continuing to assume that buyer agent compensation is always included in the listing price

Consequence: Under the new structure, buyer agent compensation must be negotiated separately; failing to plan for this cost can affect acquisition budgets

Correction: Ask every listing agent about seller-offered buyer agent compensation and factor direct buyer agent costs into acquisition underwriting

Signing a buyer representation agreement without negotiating the compensation terms

Consequence: Default compensation rates may significantly exceed what is necessary for investor-level transactions

Correction: Negotiate flat fees or reduced percentages for buyer representation agreements, especially for repeat investors with established acquisition criteria

Test Your Knowledge

1.What key change did the 2024 NAR settlement implement regarding buyer agent compensation?

2.How much can sophisticated investors reduce transaction costs per deal under the new commission structure?

3.What fee structure should investors propose for buyer representation agreements?