Key Takeaways
- Kelo expanded the definition of "public use" for eminent domain but triggered nationwide legislative pushback.
- Murr established a multi-factor test for defining the "relevant parcel" in regulatory takings analysis.
- Post-Kelo legislation in 44 states restricts eminent domain for economic development purposes.
- Due diligence should include research into government plans and regulatory trends that could trigger eminent domain or takings issues.
This track contains subscriber-only lessons
Explore free tracks in this area of study, or subscribe for full access.
Browse available tracks"Adverse Possession, Eminent Domain & Property Litigation" is a Pro track
Upgrade to access all lessons in this track and the entire curriculum.
Test Your Knowledge
1.What was the key holding in Kelo v. City of New London?
2.How did many states respond to the Kelo decision?
3.What test did the Supreme Court establish in Penn Central for evaluating regulatory takings?