Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer

Market Timing vs. Buy-and-Hold: Evidence and Analysis

13 minPRO
4/6

Key Takeaways

  • Missing just the 10 best S&P 500 days over 20 years reduces annualized returns by approximately 50% (from 9.8% to 4.8%).
  • The best market days tend to cluster near the worst days, making it nearly impossible to capture gains while avoiding losses.
  • Successful market timing requires ~74% accuracy; professional forecasters average only 47.4% — worse than random.
  • Over every rolling 20-year period since 1926, the S&P 500 has produced positive real returns.
  • Buy-and-hold with periodic rebalancing is the evidence-based winning strategy for virtually all investors.
This track contains subscriber-only lessons

Explore free tracks in this area of study, or subscribe for full access.

Browse available tracks
"Alternative Assets, Leverage & Behavioral Finance" is a Pro track

Upgrade to access all lessons in this track and the entire curriculum.

Test Your Knowledge

1.According to J.P. Morgan, what annualized return did an S&P 500 investor earn if they missed the 10 best days over 20 years (ending 2022)?

2.According to Sharpe (1975), what accuracy rate must a market timer achieve to match a buy-and-hold investor?

3.What was the average accuracy rate of 68 prominent market forecasters tracked by CXO Advisory Group?

4.How quickly did the S&P 500 rally from its March 2020 COVID low to recover to 3,380?